SHAN SHAHID versus C.I.R., AUDIT DIVISION-II, R.T.O., LAHORE
Sections 111 (1) (b), 122 (9) and 177 of unclear income or increase of assets tax year 2007 The taxpayers claimed that the wrong tax year, ie tax year 2007, was increased while the increase was only in tax year 2008. Could have been done. Notice under section 122 (9) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 was issued on 16th 2009. And prior to the increase, the taxpayer was also not contested by issuing a notice under section 111 (1) (b) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, increasing the validity of the tax under 5 111 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 The information was made on the basis of 2007, the year 2007, against which the taxpayers under Section 122 (9) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 were issued on 16 3 2009, which was financed under section 111 (1) of the Income Tax. The year 2009 was an increase. The ordinance in the tax year 2008, if any, was required to be immediately before the financial year, which was discovered under section 111 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, which was made in the tax year 2007. , Was not immediately. The previous tax year of discovery was not in accordance with the law, and the good deletion precautionary orders passed by both the rulers were vacated by the appellate tribunal and accepted the appeal by excluding the addition under section 111 (1). Was gone (b) Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
