On the basis of the statement of the confession of Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 of the Constitution of the Constitution (10 of 1984), Article 16 Qatil AMd, the police investigated and the police arrived. It was concluded that the accused was not involved in the murder when the challan was presented, the accused was shown by the invalid order in column 2 of the challan trial court, while the convict relied on article 16 of the martyrdom 1984 case. The complainant had no complaint in relation to placing the accused in column number 2, was not expected to provide any evidence that would have involved the accused in the case, Extracted from the confessional statement of the co-accused, who would later withdraw even if it was deemed that the co-accused, while defending himself If the witness is present, the accused may be considered to have been acquitted by the prosecution against the accused, subject to Article 16 of the Law Evidence, 1984, only if the evidence is obtained through independent evidence. This would not be so, as the prosecution has already concluded that the accused was not convicted of a crime. On the evidence of the partner, being completely insecure, he did not suffer in any circumstances the difficulties and difficulties of joining him as the accused. Has to do, if at the end of the prosecution's evidence, the trial should be balanced against the interests of the court. It will be concluded that there is independent contradictory evidence against the accused, then it will allow the accused to have a hearing.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
