THATTA CEMENT COMPANY EMPLOYEES UNION versus REGISTRAR TRADE UNIONS, HYDERABAD REGION
Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution of Residence Judeta, Registration of applicable trade union Registration Applicable trade union Registration of trade union A similar petition filed by the employer company in the constitutional jurisdiction court before the High was already dismissed by the High Court Impact Certificate in connection with the trade unions issued by the Registrar, the trade unions The Constitution was upheld on dismissal and an appeal was filed against it. The decision was also rejected, therefore, the BTT could not cancel the registration grant or later set it aside by the High Court in the petition, especially when, despite the exceptional circumstances, There was no basis or justification to even reverse / reverse such a decision by adopting a contrary view. Finding contradictions on the same subject does not constitute a concurrence of the proceedings at the moment in the constitutional jurisdiction, as it may be exercised in the slightest jurisdiction, so no recent investigation in this case can be done by verifying the evidence. The reason for this was already caused by the decision made in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. The High Court refused to repeat the determination between the same parties, especially when the general principles of Race Judesta were also attracted to this request.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
