Find a Lawyer

HAJI ABDUL GHAFFAR versus HABIB ISMAIL

Section 3 Definition of Illegal Evidence Evidence The important question to consider will be whether there was any unlawful settlement complaint in this case; in the present case, it stated clearly in its complaint that it had made this plan to the plaintiff. Who was in possession of the plot and who started construction on it under contract with the complainant and handed it over to the other defendant who has never been able to get the complainant's respondents Who was granted legitimate possession by the complainant or may have surrendered the land to him legally. The second respondent, but in no case can it be alleged that there was still work underway between the parties in the case of a citizen who had complained for the title of an illegal property, even when Complainant filed a complaint. Therefore, the civil litigation was waived pending the outcome of the review

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• HYDERABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY (HESCO) through Chief Executive v. SINDH LAOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 2012 PLC 44
• ABDUL WAHAB alias TALBAN v. State 2012 YLR 45
• ENGRO FERTILIZERS LIMITED v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN AND FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2012 PLD 50
• ENGRO FERTILIZERS LIMITED v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN AND FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2012 CLD 50
• THATTA CEMENT COMPANY EMPLOYEES UNION v. REGISTRAR TRADE UNIONS, HYDERABAD REGION 2012 PLC 53
• MUHAMMAD SHOAIB GANDHI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH, through Secretary 2012 YLR 59
• SAUDI PAK INDUSTRIAL AND AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT COMPANY (PVT.) LIMITED v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2012 CLC 62
• TANVIR AHMED v. MALIR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2012 PLD 66

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

property advocate from Daharki lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes