MUHAMMAD YASEEN ALIAS BABA LADLA ALIAS BABA versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 386/34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 extortion, terrorism act, guaranteeing a person in fear of death or serious injury. The complainant for further investigation was that he received two mobile phone calls from the accused who demanded money and the complainant was extended in his statement under section 161 on failure to threaten the serious consequences of such payment. The CRPC, according to his complaint, made an oral call and added that he gave his employer a defective currency note stating that some part of the statement was filed by the FIR. Missing in Qom Although it was already arranged, the numerical number of currency notes was not noted which would enable the complainant or police to connect the accused. In case of rehabilitation; however, the complaint has been recovered from the employee's statement by the employee. It was reported that the complainant was receiving the accused's calls on a regular basis. Such a situation was neither patent for the contents of the FIR nor did the record of the complainant's statement indicate that the two numbers from which the complaint was made. The recipient had received calls that belonged to the accused, but it is not yet clear whether the two numbers were in the five SIMs of the accused who allegedly recovered the missing SIMs. Self-doubts arose, which required further investigation and the same was the case with the recovery of currency notes, the matter of the accused needed further investigation, it was raised on bail, under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
