Sections 16 (1) and (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199, the specific performance of the contract to sell denial of landlord and tenant relationship, termination of defense invasion, non-payment of tenant to the landlord and Denial of tenant relationship, he did not temporarily submit to rent rent The controller of rent against the tenant had passed the eviction order, which was upheld by the lower appellate court through the rent controller. Was approved, though it was reinstated by the Supreme Court, but the tenant temporarily did not comply with the rent order. Therefore, the controller rent. From the very beginning of the proceedings, Sindh passed the order under Section 16 (2) of the Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, denied the landlord and tenant relationship between the parties and requested that the property be the subject of the proceedings. , Was His brother bought it from the landlord and accordingly a civil suit of specific performance was held, which was in CA as a refusal of the landlord and tenant relationship, the tenant had to vacate the cover and contract. A case was to be filed for the specific performance of the CA, after which it would be given easy access to the premises if the order was approved under section 16 (1) of the Sindh. The Tenant Premise Ordinance, restored by the Controller of Rentals, was restored by the Supreme Court in 1979 and the tenant was obliged to comply with the order but did not deposit a penny in connection with the rent arrears or the subsequent rent. Refused to interfere with the withdrawal order. Defendants below the petition
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
