Sections 9, 12 and 22 of the Law (10 of 1984), Article 84 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2), O. VII, RR1 (C) and 9 (1A) (B) of the Bank Comparison of Suite Loan Fraud Evidence Signatures for Recovery The suit was filed by the bank against the defendants and the execution was ordered. He did not own his property mortgage, resulting in a lawsuit filed by the bank. The name of the defendant appeared as a witness in the deed of mortgage in connection with the property, while the Power of Attorney of the same date revealed that the same defendant executed it on the same date and some other person was shown as a witness, Such dishonesty itself has shown nothing but deception. Counterfeiting and the two documents that the banking court itself considered, under the provisions of Article 84 of the Martyrdom of the Law, 1984, considered the signatures of the accused such as a mortgage act and a power of attorney. That was the date, and instead of those available at intervals, he left to defend the petition and other documents and concluded that the banking and court signatures on the case and the authority's lawyer had investigated the matter. The case was later properly dismissed and no interference in the decision was required. Dismissed in circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
