Find a Lawyer

HYDERABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY (HESCO) THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus SINDH LAOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Sections 2 (xxx) and 46 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition dismissed from the GROvance Petition Employee's Complaint, was rejected by the Labor Court, and the Appeal Tribunal allowed the appeal of the employees, The court had. No jurisdiction to reject the employee complaint request was restored because the appeal was rejected and the employee was not reinstated and the employee was not an employee. Employees were admitted in their initial objection to the affidavit that the employee was `laborer 'and there was no illegal item found in it. Disappointed Labor Appellate Tribunal employers were given the decision to enforce the appellate tribunal's decision in their stutter and spirit, under the circumstances. \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• PAKISTAN NATIONAL SHIPPING CORPORATION v. Malik AYAZ SHARIF 2012 YLR 36
• MANSOOR AHMED MUGHAL v. NOOR QADIR TAWAQAL 2012 CLD 36
• SEA BREEZE LTD. v. Mrs. PADMA RAMESH 2012 MLD 39
• MUHAMMAD MURAD v. State 2012 PLD 42
• ABDUL WAHAB alias TALBAN v. State 2012 YLR 45
• ENGRO FERTILIZERS LIMITED v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN AND FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2012 PLD 50
• ENGRO FERTILIZERS LIMITED v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN AND FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2012 CLD 50
• Haji ABDUL GHAFFAR v. HABIB ISMAIL 2012 PCrLJ 52

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

top advocate from Jehangira lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes