Find a Lawyer

NAZAR MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Prior to the arrest of Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302 / 337H (2) / 34 convicted AMD, who was hurt by a speedy or negligent act, the accused's grant was alleged that There were only ineffective shootings at the time of the incident. And he was not expected to fire at any person when he was arrested in almost all cases, it has a reputation for dishonesty, dishonor and humiliation and in the light of the modern trends of civilized society. Pre-bail matters should also be dealt with. Instead of following the barbaric feudal traditions, the State Council failed to identify how the suspect would be assisted in the investigation of a police detention or detain his honor. It will not be possible for the accused to be arrested before their arrest.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• SARFRAZ KHAN v. ALLAH BUX 2012 PCrLJ 423
• MEHAR ALI MEMON v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman, Pakistan Railways 2012 PLD 425
• K. SWAMI WILSON v. BABOO 2012 YLR 426
• COLLECTOR, MODEL CUSTOMS COLLECTORATE, HYDERABAD v. KHUDA RAHEEM 2012 PTD 428
• DEEDAR ALI v. State 2012 MLD 433
• SHAHEEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY through Mrs.Zeeshan Fatima v. PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY 2012 PLD 434
• Malik PAHAR KHAN v. State 2012 YLR 435
• INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN v. TRANSMISSION ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES (PRIVATE) LTD. 2012 CLD 436

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

criminal advocate from Nowshera lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes