Find a Lawyer

K. SWAMI WILSON versus BABOO

Nothing was mentioned in the FIR on the grounds of section 337 F (v) / 506/147/148 Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), section 417 (2A) of criminal threat against harassment and evil. In which one of the accused was possessed. The victim was jolted / hurt until the victim was accused of causing any injuries. Contradictions of the material were seen in the ocular testimony as well as in the medical evidence, which led to the prosecution's case. Had provided ample opportunity to make suspicious. Appellant / Complainant identified illegality of any kind in illegal decision, but failed to identify any illegality in Judicial Magistrate's decision, counsel was not available about appellant's lawyer, he was Evidence was discussed by a non-judicial magistrate. The prosecution's testimony was thoroughly considered in detail and on the contents of the record. The defendants were acquitted of the circumstances because their searches were not based on speculation and limitations.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• SHABBIR TILES AND CERAMICS LABOUR UNION through Registered President v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, SINDH KARACHI 2012 PLC 416
• NAZEER v. State 2012 YLR 423
• SARFRAZ KHAN v. ALLAH BUX 2012 PCrLJ 423
• MEHAR ALI MEMON v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman, Pakistan Railways 2012 PLD 425
• COLLECTOR, MODEL CUSTOMS COLLECTORATE, HYDERABAD v. KHUDA RAHEEM 2012 PTD 428
• NAZAR MUHAMMAD v. State 2012 PCrLJ 430
• DEEDAR ALI v. State 2012 MLD 433
• SHAHEEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY through Mrs.Zeeshan Fatima v. PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY 2012 PLD 434

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

best law firms from Naudero lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes