Section 365 A / 109 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (e) abduction or abduction, kidnapping and terror act were related in the same community and on the terms of meeting since their ancestors. Prior to the incident, the parties knew each other and an FIR was lodged after the kidnapper was recovered, but none of the suspects was named in the FIR. Its characteristics or identification marks were given in the FIR, which was not fatal in the 26-hour delay in filing an FIR for ransom. A. However, in some cases it will be found to be against the benefit. Due to the delay in the prosecution case, no effective indication of litigation can be drawn. This is not the only standard to prove a case against unknown assailants, and prosecution against them can prove a charge, if the identity of the accused is proved by other solid evidence, namely, direct or circumstantial, but in the present case, either the named case. I was introduced to the accused or was presented at the instance of the prosecutor's witness The name of the accused was disclosed at the time of trial and the accused was acquitted by the trial court and any appeal against the prosecution witnesses during the court proceedings. Was not filed. In his statements to strengthen the prosecution's case, such improvement in his statements had raised serious doubts about the truth of such witnesses, such witnesses seemed incapable of dependency and raised doubts about their truth. The prosecution had failed to prove its case against the accused. Doubt, punishment and punishment
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
