Find a Lawyer

KARACHI WATER AND SEWERAGE BOARD THROUGH AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION

Article 39 The perpetual breach of a contract will depend on the innocent party's jurisdiction to elect the innocent party to either accept the contract and thus confirm or accept the nomination and consider the termination of the contract. Where the innocent party was elected. If you continue with the contract and certification, such certification will be irrevocable and the contract will continue in its entirety, meaning that it cannot suspend the breach of contract with the restoration of the contract.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• SAMIULLAH NAREJO v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Defence, Rawalpindi 2012 PLC(CS) 1205
• Syed ALI QASIM GILLANI v. State 2012 YLR 1206
• SHAHID PERVAIZ v. State 2012 MLD 1213
• MISRI v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1218
• MUHAMMAD NAEEM v. State 2012 YLR 1228
• SAFEHAVEN MARINE LTD. v. KARACHI PORT TRUST 2012 CLC 1230
• Syed IMTIAZ ALI SHAH v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Karachi 2012 PLC(CS) 1232
• NAEEM AHMED v. State 2012 YLR 1237

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

list of advocates from Risalpur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes