Section 497 (5) Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302 / 337H (2) / 147/148 / 149/114 Killers were injured by harassment, harassment, deadly weapons armed, non Applicants (defendants) were granted bail due to a legal delay at the end of their trial to cancel the legislative bail. The complainant's (applicant) convictions were that the name of the accused was clearly mentioned in the FIR with a particular character. Delays at the end of the trial have been attributed to the prosecution's actions and errors, and since there was no criminal prosecution for such delays, the accused has been behind bars for the past three years. Did not apply for bail. Eligibility but based on the legal delay at the conclusion of his trial court below, while rejecting the defendant's pre-arrest plea, it was observed that the trial court presented the accused with this case in at least 24 dates. Cannot process because it is unreadable. Individuals by the jail authorities, and even the prosecution's witnesses, were not present on some dates, although the accused sought certain postponements but the delay in the trial could not be attributed to him. Has misused the privileges of the bailout or was a dangerous person. In the circumstances, the request for cancellation of bail will be dismissed.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
