Find a Lawyer

AZMAT ZAMIR KHAN versus MST. ANEES JAMAL ALIAS RUQIYA BEGUM

Sections 16 and 18 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petitioner (applicant) guaranteed the rent controller's orders under which he was instructed to submit the arrears of rent to the court because he was the landlord. And had disputed the tenant relationship. , The rent controller had no jurisdiction to approve the rental deposit order stating that the rental agreement was approved on a temporary assessment as the rental agreement was presented and it was recognized that the landlord owned 89 Owner to the extent of? and said that the rental agreement had come into operation. The tenant was given a legal notice by the landlord under section 18 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 requiring the order of the tenant, the constitutional application was dismissed after it did not interfere.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• AHMED DIN v. State 2012 YLR 1696
• RAMESH v. State 2012 MLD 1702
• PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Food Department Government of Sindh v. JAKHARNI ROLLER FLOUR MILL, JACOBABAD 2012 CLC 1711
• ABDUL NAEEM v. State 2012 MLD 1713
• IMDAD ALI v. State 2012 YLR 1719
• SOBHARO v. ZAMEER 2012 PCrLJ 1722
• ZULFIQAR ALI JATOI v. State 2012 MLD 1726
• CAPTAIN PQ CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. v. VITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARACHI 2012 YLR 1734

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

immigration advocates from Talagang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes