The accused was mentioned in the common joint intention FIR, denying the unlawful assembly, attempting to commit to section 497 the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), sections 302, 324 and 34 of the convict AMD; The special role was not assigned. A plausible explanation was not offered to justify the presence of the accused at the scene of the incident, leading to the temporary hypothesis that the accused had a joint intention to commit the murder of the accused and was certain There are reasonable grounds to believe that the accused shared the common intention with the co-accused. There was nothing available on record at the murder commission to show that the complaining party had any motive or reason to falsely implicate the accused in this case, and that the trial was at an early stage and that no witnesses to the prosecution The evidence was not filed by the police. The accused presented the case. The accused did not come under further investigation as he had constituted an unlawful assembly where two young men were innocent. Was sitting and was brutally responsible for the accused. In the device
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
