EQUITY PARTICIPATION FUND versus ABBRASIVE PRODUCTS CO. LIMITED
Sections 9 and 10 required for recovery of the bank loan in the Circular Mandatory Supplementary Feature Not submitting the account statement, the suit filed by the bank was dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff's bank filed with the plaintiff's bank The statement of accounts, which includes, according to the Banks / Books Evidence Act, 1891, did not really reflect the entries - the pledge taken by the bank was that the financial institutions (recovery of finances) were subject to Section 9 of the Ordinance 2001 The provisions of (1) and (2) were merely a directory, and not necessarily an integral feature of the essential supply. I did not use that are found consequences for failing to comply with the direction of law or where it is proposed to be used only to emphasize the importance of the need to comply with is the urge or force. Was not specified, direction was considered as a directory and not necessarily where the instruction to do something in a particular way declared certain penalties or consequences, such as financial institutions (security 10) (3), (4) and ( 5) The consequences of failing to comply with the terms of the Financial Institutions (Recovery) Ordinance 2001, unless a good cause is shown, applying for a revoked leave, the provision was rendered mandatory. And the rule issued by the Banking Court, the principle of the provision of the law was rejected and, therefore, the matter was set aside and the case was referred to Ben. The King Court was remanded to deliver the verdict, allowing an appeal under it. General Chat Chat Lounge n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
