Sections 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 365A, 148 and 149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Qatil-e-Adm Further investigation into the export of property, valuable security, etc., riot with deadly weapons, terrorist charges, bail was not mentioned in the FIR and witnesses testified under section 161 eleven days after the incident. Was involved in his statements listed below. The PCC, therefore, was reasonably present that the accused's name was imposed after deliberation and consultation, and the possibility of his false involvement cannot be ruled out by the contents of the FIR. It is revealed that there were three prosecution witnesses at the scene of the incident. And they had seen the unidentified accused but they did not designate the accused in the FIR and it took eleven days for the accused to be admitted and involved in their statements under Section 161, CR. The PC, who raised suspicion in the prosecution case, identified the accused in the case, his presence on the spot, the character attributed to him and whether he was allowed to request bail on the accused and Because of this, further investigation into his crime is needed. Bail was granted
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
