Find a Lawyer

SOHAIL AHMED ALIAS ABU HURARA versus STATE

Section 497 Determination Code (XLV of 1860), Section 2 Q2 / e 34 Kalam Um Bail, FIR was denied in the accused's witness before the IK witness identified the accused in the identification parade. Magistrate's case came up. The section PC accused was not entitled to bail in the manner prohibited under section 497 (1) and was accordingly denied.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• Dr. PIRZADA JAMALUDDIN A. SIDDIQUI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Education 2012 PLC(CS) 996
• ABDUL RAZAK GABOLE v. State 2012 PCrLJ 999
• GOHAR alias ALI GOHAR v. State 2012 YLR 1010
• KHURSHED HUSSAIN v. State 2012 MLD 1012
• SALAHUDDIN MUGHAL v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary/ Chairman 2012 PLC(CS) 1018
• Shaikh WASEEM v. Dr. Mrs. TAHIRA HUSSAIN 2012 CLC 1019
• JAMSHEED ALI v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1022
• WARID TELECOM (PVT.) LTD. v. State 2012 MLD 1024

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

top civil advocates from Muzaffarabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes