Sections 9 (c) and 29 addicts were convicted of smuggling and evidence of smuggling, the reduction of two hundred forty packets of marijuana was recovered from the secret cavities of each kilogram of marijuana truck, which stated that packet plastic. The bags I was putting were like forty packets in each plastic bag. And one packet was sealed separately from each plastic bag and sent for chemical inspection, six kilograms of hashish was sent for testing. There was no evidence that the remaining quantities even had four loads of proof, In the circumstances it was the prosecution that the evidence was produced. Thus it was proved that the prosecution could prove six kilograms of hashish and no contradiction was found in the number of samples obtained nor was this speculation made in the weight of Control Section 29 of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, This idea can be rejected by specifying in a positive way. The suspect, no such explanation was given by the driver, to whom the vehicle belonged to the question; and how did he come to know that the existence of a hidden cavity was estimated to be six kilograms with an additional reduction factor. Received in quantities from the accused, the act of acquiring justice will be carried out. A penalty of up to eight years was upheld, and given the benefit of Section 382B, the CRPC was also given to the accused. The prosecution failed to prove that the co-accused was the original or constructive of the intoxicating substance. As it was, or had something to do with it. The co-accused was acquitted of the charge, and ordered to be released in the same circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
