Sections 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 353, 224, 225, 148 and 149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Prohibition, fine, assault or criminal offense for restraining a public servant Efforts to commit a force to relinquish a person's responsibility, resistance or obstacle to his or her legal responsibility, riot with deadly weapons, unlawful assembly, a crime of terror, the benefit of further bail investigation. In the FIR, the names of the 25 persons, including the accused, were mentioned, along with the names of their parents and even some of the accused, the complainant also mentioned their caste. Did not say that in the case of the encounter in which both sides were accused of firing, the names of 25 persons, including their parents, caste and type. Weapons can be memorized by a person and he was mentioned in the FIR without any advice or consideration, no special or exact charge was made against the accused in the FIR except that He arrived with the other 24 suspects to rescue the perpetrator, until the allegations were against the other accused and not directly against the allegation of the Whig that armed men were fired directly at the police party. Was done in R which had no role. The two accused were found empty-handed sitting in the press and no charges were leveled against them, which could prove to be an indictment for committing any type of sting or hatchet. The names of the firefighters were mentioned in any of the police personnel, but the co-offenders with whom
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
