Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 376/380/506/34 rape, theft of a dwelling house, criminal threats, joint-purpose bail, accused of further investigation grant accused (son-in-law). It was that at the behest of his mother-in-law, he committed adultery with the victim, who was also his sister. The accused admitted that they had been wrongly implicated in the case due to enmity between the parties. The alleged victim divorced, and the FIR alleged that the crime was not logical because she would not commit adultery in the presence of her mother-in-law, because of the accused's son-in-law, four months delay. After the FIR was filed. Prosecutors who can support the presence of the accused at the scene of the incident, except for the father's statement in the FIR, that the two sides had strained relations as a brother in the law of the accused. d False accusations of the accused victim divorced, in the circumstances, cannot be denied six () months after the alleged incident with the victim when his marriage was in remuneration with the victim. was done. But she did not disclose the alleged offense against her husband or family member but required further investigation under Section 497 (2), the CCP bail plea of the accused was allowed and they were admitted on bail. Gone \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
