Sections 9, 14, 86, 90 and 156 (1) reported section R599 (1) / 2009 dated 25 6 2009 Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), allegedly false declaration on section 265 and 561 goods, exporters The dismissal (of the accused / applicants) was declared as lead concrete material while the laboratory report stated the same lead powder, which was exported against the exporters under FIR Section 265K, CR PC. The trial court excluded that it could not yet be determined that the material procured by the exporters contained the same material on which the dispute could be decided only after the prosecution's record of evidence. , So it cannot be decided that there is no such thing. The prospect of being convicted of the exporters was re-judged by the Customs Traffic Committee for its correct rating, and that the charge sheet did not allege any manly ray or tax evasion. Therefore, the allegation was unfounded, whether deliberately or deliberately or with good faith, it was not yet known whether the trial court's order did not warrant any interference in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
