Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/147/148/149 murder, rioting, assault with deadly weapons, illegal assembly bail, refusal to recover the accused and co-accused in the morning. On time, he went to work and took bail from the complainant and his accomplices, where the accused and the accomplices opened fire and killed the three men. The conviction of the accused was that nothing was recovered from it. That there was tribal rivalry between the parties. Most people relieved themselves in the morning before leaving for work, and because of this, the presence of paralysis in the colon of the deceased persons indicated that the incident did not happen as the FI did. This was mentioned in R. Evidence and the question of what was the effect of rehabilitation or the effect of non-recovery can only be had when the evidence was recorded so that there can be no basis for guaranteeing non-recovery at the bail-out stage and the enmity will always exist. The question was whether the FLR was useful because of hostility or whether the incident was encouraged because of the hostility, both of which could be argued for equality. The previous enmity did not help either party in most cases, at least for those who died at the bailout stage. The defendant's reasoning for the presence of a fecal matter in the intestine will not detain the court because the evidence can be deeply appreciated that cannot be made at the bail-out stage. And there was no question as to who it was
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
