Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/147/148/149 assassination, attempt to commit murder, arson, disorderly armed with deadly weapons, illegal assembly bail, denial of bail The failure to engage with a lawyer for long, delaying the end of the trial, was due to the influence of the accused persons that they had been behind bars for more than two years and their case had not yet been settled. ? He could not be held responsible for the delay in the trial, and that the former petitioners' charge had dealt with the trial court's direction within four months with the instruction to terminate the case, but that did not happen. Accurate records of the case show that the accused have long avoided engaging with a lawyer who has shown their carelessness and carelessness in pursuing their case, even as the court has charged the accused with public expenditure. But also offered to provide a lawyer. The plaintiffs refused, which showed that they had sufficient resources to arrange counseling, although the High Court had directed the plaintiffs to dismiss the case within four months in the petitions filed by the accused. It is also a matter of record that from time to time, the accused persons failed to engage with the lawyer, therefore, no instruction was given as they were rendered useless due to non-participation. The lawyer's compensation was delayed. The suspects were found to be self-motivated and extending bail on legal grounds due to legal delays. The request for bail was dismissed in the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
