ALI ANWAR versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD
Article 199 Allotment of land heard without constitutional petition was condemned, for the last 30 to 40 years and their names were also mentioned in the income record as green and they were paying land revenue to the government. On the contrary, the respondents were claiming their entitlement and claiming what they had allegedly inherited from their forefathers. The accuracy order approved by the Board of Revenue in interest was not demonstrated or disclosed in any way that the applicant's claim was investigated in the light of documentary evidence, with the applicant attending an applicant Was also mentioned but on the contrary, the applicants took the stand. That neither applicant nor his lawyer was present at the time of T's death, he ordered through the Board of Revenue, as he was not allowed to join the proceedings; therefore, he was completely withheld. And questions under the constitutional jurisdiction were barred from presenting documents confirming their claim to the land in the High Court, which rejected the Board's Revenue Order. And remanded to retrieve the case
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
