Find a Lawyer

SOSAN MUNAWAR versus DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, GUJRANWALA

Section 9 Constitution Pakistan, Arts 199 and 212 Constitution Petition Maintenance Transfer Petitioner challenged the government's order to move it from work to another competent authority, in view of the policy of rationalization of P-section T (Phase II). What was And consequently on the recommendation of the District Rationalization Committee, the applicant as well as 241 other teachers were approved for the transfer and transfer of their posts to schools, a key feature of the service, and by authority. A better decision can be made. The person serving the posting and transfer was outside the jurisdiction of the High Court constitutional jurisdiction as it was unable to maintain the constitutional petition under Article 212, under which circumstances r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• Raja MUHAMMAD JAVAID v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2012 PLC(CS) 1166
• FATEH MUHAMMAD v. BAKHSHAU 2012 CLC 1172
• MANZOOR AHMED v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1172
• GHULAM QADIR v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION CANTT., BAHAWALPUR 2012 MLD 1173
• JAVED SADIQ MALIK v. MUHAMMAD AFZAL NAJEEB 2012 CLC 1178
• Chaudhry MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. HABIB BANK LTD. 2012 CLD 1183
• MUHAMMAD UMAR TARAR v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Law and Parliamentary Affairs 2012 YLR 1187
• SAJJAD AHMAD alias SHAHBAZ v. State 2012 MLD 1187

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

immigration advocates from Okara lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes