MUHAMMAD ATHER versus MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, THROUGH SECRETARY DEFENCE, RAWALPINDI
Arts 25 and 199 (3) Malahide-proof Petitioner of the Constitution Petitioner Armed Forces Bar served as a Major in the Pak Army and wanted to receive voluntary / premature retirement but was sought by the authorities. The message was conveyed that his request was regretted and he resigned without any terminal benefits; therefore, he resigned, the petitioner's application for voluntary / premature retirement was never considered and He was forced to resign from the commission, praising Mullah for such action by the authorities, because the Application the applicant is not allowed to describe it. Neither in this case nor for the reasons they have been known that their application was not valid for voluntary / premature retirement as applicants like other employees have been appointed by the officials of any organization or ministry. Was entitled to behave under the policy, even though discrimination cannot be allowed in the way it was intended. Or they were obliged to act in a fair, equitable and just manner, rather than in their own way. Ainar's condemnation was heard and his plea was not considered, but he was forced to resign, It was an opportune time for the authorities to reject the injunction, in violation of the principles of natural justice, for which the petitioner served the armed forces. 14 1/2 years and under this policy he was entitled to a benefit of up to 75% and as such, under constitutional jurisdiction he could not be denied his right to escape the High Court and accept the applicant's resignation.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
