Sections 77 and 114 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 3 of the Punjab Tenancy (Amendment) Act (VII of 1952), Civil Procedure Code of Progress (V8 1908), O II, R2 and O XXIII, R. 1 In the Special Relief Act (of 1877), the confirmation of the change in the taxation of revenue by the court and the jurisdiction of the civil court in the case of suits for declaration of section 42 was not related to the declaration of possession rights. The civil court had ruled on the same record, which showed that the matter was excluded in the Shamda Diya according to the share of women and women who had been settled as settlers from 1862 to 1893. Occupation, those persons were to be listed under public persons, and if the shareholders in the candle hold would not remain in possession, the abolitionists and their land would be excluded from the process of distribution. Neither shareholders were included in the summit so suit land was excluded from the distribution of candles to shareholders. Since the abstainers were listed in the revenue records, the plaintiffs who had become owners of the act of abstinence law. The suit filed by them for the title of the declaration was competent. The first unqualified suit shall not bar the entry of appropriate and competent suit (then) under O XXIII, R 1, CPC and O II, R 2, CPC. Will be. In the previous case the suit filed by the competent plaintiff was ineligible, in which case the applicable plaintiff was the owner of the property. They rightly filed a lawsuit challenging the negative entry in the tax records. The suit was filed within the limit, where the law was supported or authorized
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
