Find a Lawyer

KHURSHID ANWER versus CH. AKBAR

Article 47 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Request for Settlement While implementing the decree passed in favor of the applicants, they asked the court to enforce a compromise between the parties before the decree. The judge had a contract with a super-assisted command. In a case which could not be resolved by an enforcement court using its jurisdiction under section 47, the CPC's executive court erroneously stated that the execution request could be considered a suit while the amending jurisdiction. I was properly rejected by the lower appellate court's execution court order. High Court denies interference in lower appellate court petition order, which was dismissed in circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• MUHAMMAD FAROOQ alias PANNA v. State 2012 YLR 381
• SIKANDAR v. State 2012 MLD 382
• ABDUL WASAY v. State 2012 PLD 383
• ZAFAR IQBAL v. Mst. NASIM AKHTAR 2012 PLD 386
• HASSAN MUHAMMAD RANA v. P.T.C.L. through President 2012 PLC 386
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. AYYAN GHAZANFFAR 2012 PLD 392
• MUHAMMAD ISHAQ v. P.P.O. 2012 PLC(CS) 392
• MAH RUKH v. UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES 2012 MLD 392

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

criminal advocate from Landi Kotal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes