Section 13 (3) West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Constitution of Pakistan, Fourth Constitution, Article 199 Constitutional Request Suite, which is for the collection of juvenile care allowance, order against the defendant's lawyer. Implementation was ordered by the Family Court, and since the defendant was out of the country, the petitioners of the minors, based on a process from the Special Power of Attorney Executive Court, defended the case by the defendant. Done. The father) and the arrest warrant were issued against the applicant (grandfather) was that the decision-maker had immovable and immovable property in the country which could be attached to the satisfaction of this decree and the preliminary hearing. The petitioner subsequently separated himself from the Family Court proceedings in this case, and for that reason, could not be held liable. Under the provisions of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, the express provisions of section 13 (3) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, will be reviewed, violated the law and set forth in the said provisions. The procedure adopted should be followed. Although the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code 1908 were excluded by section 17 of the Act, the general principles could be summoned to administer justice where the Family Court was not authorized in the West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964. Was. The direct receipt of the order from the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967's Land Revenue and Survival Chap VIII provided the mechanism for such recovery, and for that reason, when a specific product was enforced for enforcement of the decree.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
