Article 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Sections 39, 42, 52, 53 The scope of the declaration in favor of entries in the record of rights is, no doubt, to prove the defendants on their own grounds. Read. Evidence, but the beneficiary of the mutation was obliged to transact and substantiate the change, which the defendants failed to accept, even in the possession of the plaintiff, was not denied by the defendants. The absence of judicial proceedings will not provide a preliminary view even if otherwise, for wrongful conduct, there was no restriction against the partner or co-owners of the suit in the suit. The boundaries were owned by, in the case of a Declaration Circle, beginning on the date. The threat to the plaintiff's title and the final assault on the right or the denial of the plaintiff would be considered as a plaintiff when he was a co-participant in the KATA, he could not be knocked out; That was reasonable speculation. It can also be examined, that how the admission to the jamabandi came when the mutation was not valid, the assumption of accuracy was not available when the inquiries filed by the two courts were set aside. And the defendants filed a lawsuit. Decision in their favor, in the circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
