Find a Lawyer

MST. GAMAN versus MUHAMMAD AMIN

Section 115 Theoretical Scope The scope of the results under the review court by both the courts of the jurisdiction was to see how the results obtained were recorded as well as any strict and sharp rule. In the event of harmony, the High Court lacked jurisdiction for entertainment. Application under section 115, CPC; Examining evidence where misinterpretation of documentary evidence appeared on record. And intervene where results based on reading and misreading of material evidence on the files were obtained

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• ABDUL REHMAN v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI 2012 MLD 686
• MUHAMMAD MUMTAZ v. State 2012 MLD 693
• MUHAMMAD ARIF v. NAZEER AHMED 2012 PCrLJ 696
• BASHIR AHMAD KHAN v. GHULAM SADAR-UD-DIN KHAN 2012 CLC 699
• BAKHT FRAZ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, MULTAN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman Pakistan Railways, Islamabad 2012 CLD 706
• TANVEER v. State 2012 YLR 708
• LATEEF AHMED v. State 2012 PCrLJ 708
• FATEH SHER v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER,VEHARI 2012 CLC 712

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

top civil advocates from Piaro goth lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes