Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

DIVISIONAL EVACUEE TRUST COMMITTEE versus ABDULLAH


Section (()) The sale of a property in favor of a panchayat for the care of Hindu widows of a charitable or religious institution does not by itself prove that any property acquired by the panchayat is owned by the trustee. The Thi or Panchayat was a religious or charitable institution

1970 S C M R 503

Present : Muhammad Yaqub Ali and Wahiduddin Ahmad, JJ

DIVISIONAL EVACUEE TRUST COMMITTEE, KARACHI‑Petitioner

versus

ABDULLAH AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K‑29 of 1969, decided on 8th January 1970.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Karachi, dated the 24th January 1969, in L. P. A. No. 9 of 1968). ,

Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), ------

-------S. 4(3)‑Charitable or religious institution‑Sale deed of one property in favour of Panchayat acquired for maintenance of Hindu widows‑Does not by itself prove that any property acquired by Panchayat was trust property or that Panchayat was a religious or charitable institution.

Ajmal Mian, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Anwar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 8th January 1970.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, J.

‑The Divisional Evacuee Trust Committee, petitioner herein, failed to lead any cogent evidence in support of its claim that House No. O. T. 3/138, Mithadar, Karachi, was attached to a charitable Trust or that the Nasarpuri Community Panchayat, the evacuee owner of the house was a charitable or religious institution within section 4(3) of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958. The transfer of the house in favour of the respondents by the Settlement authorities was, therefore, not open to exception at the instance of the petitioner.

No document relating to the constitution of Nasarpuri Community Panchayat was forthcoming. Reliance was, however, placed by the petitioner on the copy of a sale deed of another property in favour of the Panchayat acquired for the maintenance of Hindu widows. This did not by itself prove that the Nasarpuri Panchayat was a religious or charitable institution or that any property acquired by the Panchayat was trust property.

The view taken by the Settlement authorities and the High Court is, in the circumstances, plainly correct. The petition for leave to appeal is dismissed.

Leave refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Matiari lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.