MUHAMMAD ASAD MALIK versus RENT CONTROLLER, BAHAWALPUR
Article of Pakistan Art, 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction Request for Removal, Leave for Selection, Appeal Bail for the Tenant Applicant (Applicant) has been approved under which the tenant's application for removal Was excluded and permission to request the removal of the landlord was held that the landlord and tenant had a relationship between the parties because the property, after litigation, was attached by the implementing court and the rent After the auction proceedings, the acquirer acquired the same property as the tenant's holiday. Otherwise I was not in a position to apply. The honest position was that at the time of filing the eviction application, the landlord (respondent) was the owner of the property and the tenant (applicant) was in possession of the tenant, the basic principle was that once a tenant, there was always a house rent. The landlord, who then occupied the property, could no longer deny the landlord and tenant L's relationship before the landlord filed for eviction request that the property be subject to a decree. Attached to the Enforcement and was auctioned off, which was a homestead and a residential residence and property The guards tried to keep the occupants in control. The first and foremost principle of the High Court was to exercise jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution in favor of any party of the property for a long time without paying the rent under the umbrella of the land between the landlords and the other parties. That the party is in favor of it. High Court to the High Court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
