MUHAMMAD ZAFAR versus PUNJAB PROVINCIAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.
Sections 2 (d), (f) (G), 5A, 13 and 15 Tenant's eviction on a default basis on payment of rent and personal homeowner's personal request prior to the landlord's request The filing was done on the basis of filing, which was not favored by the courts below and the matter was finally settled by the High Court of Personal Needs, which was taken in the present petition, the application was not taken into effect. The tenant says the landlord had no plans to build an approved bank branch, which was meaningless, because the landlord had to approve the site plan before submitting a eviction request. Was not necessary, which can be an act. Such permission, which was performed after the vacant occupation of the disputed property, could increase the eviction of the landlord, but in this case there was no precedent for filing a disclosure application. It was held that section 5A of the West Pakistan Citizen Rental Ordinance, 1959, is not applicable to the facts of this case because the plot was leased to a tenant who was treated as a non-residential building treatment. Couldn't be done, and as rent increases. The ordinance considered by Section 5A of the Ordinance was applicable only to the buildings mentioned in Section 2 (d) of the tenants who installed the saw / saw machine in the premises, which was a kind of business and the tenants. The commercial advice for, therefore, was canceled because the restriction on section 5A of the West Pakistan Citizens Rent was applicable in this case, when the tenants had never paid a better rent.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
