SS 3 and 4 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), 5 200 Prevention of Unlawful Occupation of Property The complaint against the applicant / complainant's claim was that she was the widow of the owner of the disputed property and died of her husband's death. Even then she remained in contact with the property until 1995, but after that, the respondents / suspects occupied her land with the association of the former owners The respondents / accused also claimed that all these facts. There is a lot of buyers of disputed land through the approved variable in their favor after completion. Legal Requirements In cases, there appears to be a dispute between the parties and the applicant can restore his possession by mobilizing the law. The best way for the applicant was to restore his property or file an alleged legal case. Having a private complaint and not an entity under the Illegal Disposition Act, 2005, the applicant admitted in his own private complaint that he was not physically occupied with the land in the dispute and was alleged by it She was ousted from the use of force, contrary to the facts of the case, the respondents found in her favor, which showed that they did not belong to the occupation group. Or there were serious offenses, even on the contents of the complaint made by the petitioner, that there was no such allegation, which falls within the purview of Section 3 of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005, no jurisdictional weakness, point Irregularity of view, irregularity or malfunction of the procedure was found, so that the High Court intervenes in reviewing the disqualification order.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
