Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus BASHIR AHMAD


Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908) A XLI, r 5 mini-order to stay on execution is excluded from appeal court Supreme Court refuses to interfere with appellate court order

1970 S C M R 183

Present : Hamoodur Rahman, C. J. Sajjad Ahmad and Wahiduddin Ahmad JJ.

Mian MUSHTAQ AHMAD‑Petitioner

versus

Ch. BASHIR AHMAD‑Respondent,

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No.194 of 1969 decided on 10th October 1969.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore dated the 15th April 1969 in F.A.O. No. 70 of 1969).

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

O. XLI , r . 5-Money decree Stay of execution pending appeal Discretion of Court Supreme Court refuse to interfere with order of appellate Court .

Khalil‑ur‑Rahman Khan

,

Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rana Maqbul Ahmad Qadri Attorney for Petitioner,

Nemo for Respondent:

Date of hearing: l0th‑October1960

JUDGMENT

SAJJAD AHMAD, J.‑

The petitioner has filed a First Appeal in the High Court (F. A. O. No. 70/69) against a money decree in the sum of Rs. 50,000 passed against him ex parte on the basis of a pro‑note. By an interlocutory order, the High Court has admitted the appeal, but has refused to stay the execution of the decree. It has, however, been directed that the decree‑holder Will not withdraw the amount without furnishing adequate security to the satisfaction of the executing Court.

In this petition for Special Leave to Appeal against the order of the High Court, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it is not possible for the petitioner to raise this amount and that even if he were to do so by pooling all his re sources, the blockade of his money would wreck his business. The order refusing stay of execution has been made by the High Court in due exercise of its discretion in the matter wish which we are not inclined to interfere. The learned counsel has stated that the petitioner can furnish security to pay the decrial amount if his appeal is dismissed by the High Court. The petitioner may move the High Court for modification of its order, if so advised.

The petition is dismissed.

Leave refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Head Marala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.