Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 210 of 1967, decided on 12th October 1967.
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Karachi Bench, dated the 9th March 1967, in Writ Petition No. 517 of 1961).
, Sched., Part I‑House transferred as a whole to G a claimant and P. T. O. issued‑S a non‑claimant at first raising no objection but after G had made renovations and repairs S filing belated NCH Form for transfer of portion in his occupation‑ Question whether not stopped by conduct from claiming transfer Special Leave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court to consider question.
Sh. Bashir Ahmad, Senior Advocate Supreme Court (Ihsanul Haq, Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by S. Inayat Hussain, Attorney for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Date of hearing : 12th October 1967.
The facts giving rise to this petition for special leave to appeal are as follows The property in dispute was transferred as a whole to the petitioner by order of the learned Chief Settlement Commissioner. The respondent, Syed Zafar Hussain Wasti, challenged this order by a petition for a writ in the High Court of West Pakistan. He was successful in having the order of the learned Chief Settlement Commissioner quashed and obtaining a direction that the Settle ment authorities should transfer the ground floor of the property in dispute to him in accordance with the order of the Deputy Settlement Commissioner, dated 2nd August 1960. A Letters Patent Bench dismissed the appeal of Mst. Ghulam Fatima from this order. She now seeks special leave to appeal.
The respondent is a non‑claimant displaced person and was in occupation of the ground floor of the property in question. Mst. Ghulam Fatima is a claimant displaced person and was in possession of the entire first floor of the property. She also had in her possession a garage and some out‑houses on the ground floor. It appears that a NCH Form had been put in by the respondent in this case after a Provisional Transfer Order had been issued to Mst. Ghulam Fatima. Prior to the issue of that document, the Deputy Settlement Commissioner had visited the premises in question and had asked the respondent whether he had any objection to the transfer of the property in favour of Mst. Ghulam Fatima. It seems to be an admitted fact that he raised no such objection. It is contended by Mr. Bashir Ahmad on behalf of the petitioner, that after the issue of the P. T. O. in favour of Mst. Ghulam Fatima, she incurred considerable expenditure in renovating the property, acting on the faith of the respondent's statement that he was not interested in the property. It is con tended that his conduct might be sufficient to raise the bar of estoppel against him. The point certainly merits consideration.
The respondent put in his Form on the 13th June 1960, where as the petitioner had, it seems, spent money on the property in February and March 1960, after obtaining the order of transfer on the 13th November 1959, and the P. T. O. on the 4th February 1960. This is borne out by leer affidavit on the file at page 75 et seq.
Mr. Bashir Ahmad also contends that it was not open to the Additional Settlement Commissioner to accept the transfer form of the respondent after a P. T. O. had been issued to the petitioner, at such a belated stage, even though further extension for such applications were allowed by the Settlement authorities. Whether or not the Additional Settlement Commissioner could accept it if the property already stood in the name of another person, is a point which too may have to be considered.
We therefore, grant leave to appeal as prayed. The petition will furnish security in the sum of Rs. 1,000 as costs, prior to the appeal being heard.
Leave granted.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer