It owns the claim of the former copyright under section 6 (a) West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XVIII, RR 1 and 2 pre-emption case. On the basis of the gift modification granted in his favor, the proof of the property before the ounce shall not lie to the plaintiff to prove his right to self-determination, nor has he himself affirmed nor any such right A witness has been presented to prove this, but his counsel has shown it in a copy statement. According to the copy proof of the gift mutation from Jambandi and Partwar to Patwari, such copy of the gift mutation will not be admissible in the proof, even if it was exhibited in the statement of the counsel of the claimant, it would have no clear value and claimant. ? The basis for this is that no valid statements of the plaintiff can be approved and his testimony recorded after the close of the defendant's evidence cannot be read in evidence, but will only be read again. ttal evidence the plaintiff had failed to prove defendant's superior right to pre-emption at the time of sale, the filing of cases and injunctions was excluded, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
