Find a Lawyer

SAEED AHMAD versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 murder convictions, joint-purpose bail, arrest of the defendants for further investigation was that he was falsely involved in the case for the purpose of police. ? , And the suspect's name was not included in the FIR but was later included on the basis of additional witness statements. The validity accused was not named in the FIR and was subsequently included on the basis of statements of two witnesses under Section 161, CR PC. He said that the accused had made additional judicial confessions before the victim regarding the murder of the victim, but the possibility of the accused being lied could not be ruled out. The suspect will also have the benefit of the suspect at the bail-out stage when the accused was already granted bail and was kept indefinitely by the accused behind bars.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• NISHAT CHUNIAN LTD. v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Local Government 2012 CLD 1288
• MUHAMMAD WARIS v. D.P.O. 2012 YLR 1288
• MUHAMMAD AHSAN ALAM v. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN 2012 CLC 1290
• TAHIR ABBAS v. SECRETARY LIVE STOCK, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE 2012 PLC(CS) 1293
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. State 2012 MLD 1295
• UMAR HAYAT v. State 2012 YLR 1296
• ISLAMIC LAWYERS MOVEMENT through Tahir Farooq alias Allah Bakhsh Leghari v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad 2012 CLC 1300
• ALLAH DIWAYA v. Mst. SUKAH KHATOON 2012 MLD 1300

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

property advocate from Sadiqabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes