Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 365B abduction, forcing a woman to abduct or for marriage, etc. The bail, further indictment against the accused, was alleged to have led the complainant's daughter Kidnapped and took it to him. In another city, where he subjected her to adultery, the perpetrators of the crime were that the alleged kidnapper was his legally married wife. That his nickname had not been challenged yet. The alleged kidnapper had filed a private complaint before the magistrate, in which he confessed to the accused's legally married wife. The alleged kidnapper filed an application against his father and uncle under Section 22A, CR PC. It has been alleged that the kidnappers filed a lawsuit for marriage bargaining while the accused filed a restitution for marital rights, which was being heard before the Family Court, and that in their residence. The nineteen (19) days were delayed. The alleged abductor admitted in his statement under Section 164, CR PC that he had fled with the accused and that the kidnapper had gone to a different city with the accused where they both copied the marriage contract. , Lived with the application under section 22A. The CCP filed by the alleged kidnapper, the private complaints filed by the alleged kidnapper against his parents, and the lawsuit filed before the Family Court, were on the record Family Court has yet to confirm the nurse's investigating officer. Had not decided whether the court had ever tried to investigate the truth of the accused's marital affair, section 497 (2), CCPC
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
