Find a Lawyer

MAZHAR HUSSAIN versus CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF, PUNJAB

The withdrawal of the memorandum of appeal relating to the limitation of appeal of section 11 and 12 was available for filing an appeal under section 12 of the Punjab Waqf Properties Ordinance 1979, under which the appellants against the decision passed under section 11 of the ordinance. Was given no warning for objections. Appellants were given office and memorandum appeal to dispose of their objections within a period of three days. And the appellants dismissed the objections and terminated the appeal within the stipulated period. Occupations were again raised by the office a few times. The lawyer believed that the appeal was not necessary to return the memorandum and the office directed the retention of the memorandum and directed the appellants to resolve the matter. The withdrawal of Memorial Memorial's appeal to the Appeals Office was not legal. The appeal was filed by the appellants, it cannot be stated to prevent the ban. , The appeal was entered at regular hearing in the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• MUHAMMAD NAZIR v. State 2012 MLD 1519
• PEER BAKHSH alias ZULFIQAR alias BHUTTO v. State 2012 YLR 1519
• HABIB-UR-RAHMAN alias BAO v. THE STATE 2012 PCrLJ 1522
• IMRAN FAISAL LUMBERDAR v. State 2012 MLD 1524
• REHMAT ELLAHI v. ABDUL MAJEED 2012 PCrLJ 1529
• MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ v. State 2012 MLD 1530
• Ch. ZAFAR HUSSAIN v. BORDER AREA COMMITTEE through Chairman 2012 MLD 1538
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. SHAMAS-UD-DIN 2012 CLC 1541

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

us immigration advocates from Doltala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes