Article 190 (3) and 173 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Articles 302/148/149 murder, aggravated armed with deadly weapons, unlawful assembly magistrate jurisdiction to send a case-court session for trial Challenged) the order of the Court of Session by which the accused was summoned to stand trial as an accused in the FIR and the station house officer (SHO) was instructed that He should submit a new report in this regard under section 737373, accusing the CCPC of being innocent. Neither his name was listed in the police inquiry nor in column number 2 nor in column number 3 of the report under section 173, the CCP submitted to the magistrate, and the magistrate summoned the accused illegally and The challan was sent to the sessions court for trial. Although section 190 (3), under the CCPC, the magistrate should not have been investigated, however, he was not expected to act as a post-officer for transferring the trial to the trial court. Because a one-time relationship was specifically mentioned by a Sessions Court regarding a crime, referred to in a report under Section 73 Cr73, CRPC, or in a complaint under Section 1, CRPC. Rather, he is expected to make up his mind on what the police have put in front of him. Complainant, to determine whether special trial charges are disclosed by the Sessions Court of Sessions (trial court), and neither the offender is admitted nor his Upon confessing the crime, he obtained jurisdiction. In it
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
