Find a Lawyer

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE versus CRESENT TEXTILE MILLS

Appellant's (department) period of receipt of imposed tax receipts or lesser taxes imposed beyond the time limit set forth in Section ((()) Sales Tax Act, 1990) Sales Tax Was set up under section 36 (3) of the Act.The requirement of 1990 was not compulsory because no predetermined result was presented. Could not pass the order, which was exceeded by the time limit set by the High Court for the said decisions. The points involved were under appeal to the Supreme Court, therefore, And based on local ownership, the present case was decided in the light of the decisions of the High Court and subject to the final decision of the Supreme Court pending appeals. Negative

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• MUHAMMAD SALEEM CHOHAN v. MAZHAR HUSSAIN 2012 MLD 1079
• AMEER MAI v. JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, YAZMAN, 2012 PCrLJ 1082
• MUBEEN NAWAZ v. State 2012 YLR 1088
• MUHAMMAD ALI KHAN v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2012 MLD 1089
• MUHAMMAD IKRAM v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1097
• MUSHTAQ AHMAD v. State 2012 YLR 1101
• AZKAR AHMAD v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY (IT AND TELECOM DIVISION), ISLAMABAD 2012 PLC(CS) 1101
• ALI SHER v. ABDUL HAQ 2012 MLD 1106

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

best law firms from Moro lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes