NISAR AHMED ALIAS KALI ALIAS IMRAN ALIAS NISARA versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 395/412/392/109/337 A (ii) Receiving stolen property in the commission of robberies, robberies, robbery, aggravated, felonies and modia bail. Further, the complainant reported the crime to the police and gave a brief description of the exterior features and color of the unidentified suspect, in which the accused guaranteed to hold an identity parade instead of establishing the identity of the Investigation Officer. The shortcut disclosed from the contents of the Complainant's Supplementary Statement that the accused persons belong to different parts of the two provinces, I could not say how the complainant learned the names of the accused, their parents and residence. The fact that the police had instructed the complainant to get the accused involved in the case could not be denied for allegedly seizing two gold bangles. For example, the accused may have arranged for the police to produce circumstantial evidence against the accused, in which case the prosecution's argument that the accused had been involved in fourteen previous cases of the same nature would bail him out. The matter of refusal cannot be considered. He was not convicted in any of the previous cases, so there were several reasons why the criminal case under section 497 (2) requires further investigation, the accused's CCP bail. The bail was granted and he was admitted on bail.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
