TAHIR ABBAS versus SECRETARY LIVE STOCK, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE
Article 199 Constitution Petition Civil Service Applicants Applicants (applicants) responded to an advertisement by applying to the District Livestock Officer for various posts, after which they submitted a proposal for the proposals made by the relevant department. Unilaterally canceled and contacted applicants. The Provincial Ombudsman, which accepted their representation and directed the Applicants to issue an appointment letter within 15 days, issued the order of the Provincial Ombudsman and the applicants directed the concerned officers and department. Submitted to the High Court for execution of the order of An offer was made just for the meeting of the Provincial Ombudsman of this department and the officers concerned. That a large number of people were unaware of the post of the post and the department is going to advertise the posts, and the applicants should wait for the decision of the appeal filed by the Governor Punjab to comply with the order of the Provincial Ombudsman. It was his duty to issue orders. That filing an appeal before the Governor has no scope for compliance with the Provincial Ombudsman's order and, if the appeal is decided by the Department, it has the full right to expel the applicants. Applicants When the Provincial Ombudsman had directed the concerned department to issue a letter of appointment in favor of the applicants, it was agreed that the offer for appointment was issued in the relevant department. The officers were public workers and were under the obligation to comply with the approved order. By letter and spiritually through the Office of the Provincial Ombudsman, unless
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
