Find a Lawyer

KARIM BAKHSH versus STATE

The definition of Section 302 (b) Qatil-e-Amad evidence was in doubt with the medical evidence acumen version, which negated the presence of four eyewitnesses in case the gun was recovered on the accused's notice. The spot forensic science laboratory was dispatched after the fabrication of the crime blanks after an unequivocally significant delay, therefore, this could not be ruled out and the positive report of the forensic science laboratory could not be relied upon. The benefit was extended to the accused and he was acquitted of the circumstances.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• GHULAM ALI v. Mst. GULZAR BEGUM 2012 MLD 1254
• ZIA-UR-REHMAN v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, Shakargarh 2012 YLR 1257
• MUHAMMAD ASIF v. State 2012 MLD 1260
• WAZIR AHMED v. State 2012 YLR 1262
• ABDUL REHMAN v. State 2012 YLR 1270
• Ch. NIZAM DIN v. WAPDA through Chairman 2012 MLD 1270
• QAMAR EJAZ v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1274
• KHALID RASHEED v. State 2012 MLD 1274

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

famous supreme court advocate from Nowshera lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes