Find a Lawyer

IBRAR HUSSAIN BUKHARI versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE LAHORE

Section 5 and Schedule Constitution of Pakistan Article 199 Constitutional Petition Suit were issued simultaneously for recovery of minor suit restitution allowance which led the husband to argue that the amount of restitution allowance was high, and the same rate More than 25% of the over-the-counter valid documents presented before the Trial Court in Annual Additions show that the husband was a wealthy man, taking into account the parties' position and the fact that the minor was a Special child, there was nothing illegal in the judgment to the extent of the amount of restitution allowance the following court The annual increase at the rate of 25% was too high for this restoration allowance, and no solid basis was mentioned for this. In this decision, the High Court upheld the constitutional request for amendment of the annual increase to the extent of 10 maintenance. Care allowance was disposed of

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY, LAHORE v. RIAZ AKHTAR 2012 YLR 1682
• SARDAR ALI v. TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION through Tehsil Nazam 2012 YLR 1686
• GULSHAN JABEEN v. SHAHBAZ KHAN 2012 MLD 1687
• JUNAID IQBAL BUTT v. MUHAMMAD BABAR SHAHZAD QADRI 2012 YLR 1694
• ASIM ALI alias CHAHLI v. State 2012 MLD 1704
• Mian MUHAMMAD SHER v. MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2012 CLC 1707
• NOOR MUHAMMAD v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1708
• MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ BHATTI v. QAMAR JAVED 2012 YLR 1709

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

property advocate from Shakargarh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes