Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ BHATTI versus QAMAR JAVED

Section 13 Allowed to evict a tenant based on the personal need of the landlord The courts simultaneously allowed that the tenant's appeal was that the dismissal request was not based on good faith and that the upper limit for raising it Built with purpose The information about the accuracy of the rent and the answers given by the tenant suggest that the tenant wanted to set the price for vacating the premises under questions in the form of a 20-year goodwill. Which was an error caused by the apparent need for the landlord on record. And she was fully entitled to make a choice about the suitability of the shop to run her business, whose tenancy had expired, to remain in possession of the property after the expiration of her term. Was absolutely not right. Affidavit or statement of lease agreement was sufficient to prove a landlord's significant need in the form of an affidavit Withdrawal orders were approved in accordance with the eviction process law Appeal was dismissed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• IBRAR HUSSAIN BUKHARI v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE LAHORE 2012 YLR 1703
• ASIM ALI alias CHAHLI v. State 2012 MLD 1704
• Mian MUHAMMAD SHER v. MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2012 CLC 1707
• NOOR MUHAMMAD v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1708
• Haji MUHAMMAD NAWAZ KHOKHAR v. UNITED BANK LIMITED 2012 CLD 1709
• TALIB HUSSAIN v. State 2012 MLD 1711
• MUHAMMAD SULTAN v. NOOR MUHAMMAD 2012 YLR 1714
• Mst. ZAHOOR ELLAHI v. ADDL: COMMISSIONER (R) 2012 YLR 1718

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

property advocates from Blitang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes