Find a Lawyer

HAZOOR BAKHSH versus MST. AMEER MAI

Section 12 (2) of the Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), along with section 42 suit, was declared where the accused, after applying under section 12 (2) of the CPC, said that section 12 (2). The order effect proof is recorded at the time the application is implemented. , The CPC could not be treated as evidence in a qualifying case

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• ABDUL GHAFOOR v. MEMBER INSPECTION TEAM, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE 2012 YLR 2788
• ABDUL MAJEED v. State 2012 YLR 2792
• ANWAR HUSSAIN SHAH v. State 2012 YLR 2800
• MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE v. MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE 2012 YLR 2801
• Mufti MUHAMMAD UMAR v. State 2012 YLR 2819
• AZHAR HUSSAIN v. State 2012 YLR 2824
• Mst. GHAZALA SADIA alias GHAZALA SHAHEEN v. MUHAMMAD SAJJAD 2012 YLR 2841
• SARWAR v. SIKANDAR 2012 YLR 2846

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

best advocate from Muzaffargarh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes